अपने सुझाव भेजें :
ई मेल: justice.verma@nic.in
फैक्स: 011- 23092675
ई मेल: justice.verma@nic.in
फैक्स: 011- 23092675
---------------------------------------
कांग्रेस 1 :
दिग्विजय सिंह : राखी सावंत "एक्सपोज़" करती हैं लेकिन उस में कुछ ....
कांग्रेस 2 :
आंध्र प्रदेश के कोंग्रेस चीफ, (साथ ही एक मिनिस्टर / मंत्री होते हुए भी) : देश को आधी रात को आज़ादी मिली का मतलब यह नहीं कि लड़कियां आधी रात को बाहर घूमें, ....... दिल्ली की एक "छोटी सी घटना" पर इतना बवाल किया गया ।
कांग्रेस 3 :
कांग्रेस स्पोक्स पर्सन - टीवी वार्ता में स्मृति इरानी से (4-5 बार दोहराते हुए) : तू तो टीवी पर ठुमके लगाती है .... तेरा क्या चरित्र है ? ...... शटअप ..................
कांग्रेस 4 :
केंद्रीय मंत्री : पत्नी/ औरत पुरानी हो जाती है तो मजा नहीं ............. :( :(
कांग्रेस 5 :
केंद्रीय मंत्री : पत्नी/ औरत पुरानी हो जाती है तो मजा नहीं ............. :( :(
कांग्रेस 5 :
संसद सदस्य अभिजित मुखर्जी, (जो राष्ट्रपति के पुत्र भी हैं ) :
* dented and painted women, ...........
* who go for candle marches for fashion, ..............
* older women with kids can't be students .................
(truth of the matter is, many many many women i know have been full time MTech students after having two kids, and, I myself Shilpa Mehta, at 43, with a kid, am a student, and i do not stay away from either makeup, or discotheques or candle marches. i have the right as a citizen, and mr abhijit cannot intimidate me to stay away from ANY of these things or to chose between them)...........
(truth of the matter is, many many many women i know have been full time MTech students after having two kids, and, I myself Shilpa Mehta, at 43, with a kid, am a student, and i do not stay away from either makeup, or discotheques or candle marches. i have the right as a citizen, and mr abhijit cannot intimidate me to stay away from ANY of these things or to chose between them)...........
* these youth from college - we have been to college and we "know:" what is the "character" of students........
* these protests have "little connection" with ground realities..........
* these protests have "little connection" with ground realities..........
* they go for discotheques at night and come for protests in the day ............
------------------------------------------
after all these shocking displays of what is the position of women in their leaders minds, what is their mindset about women, still,
NOT A SINGLE DISCIPLINARY ACTION AS YET FROM THE RULING PARTY ON THESE PEOPLE _ AND THEY CLAIM TO CARE FOR WOMEN"S RIGHTS
------------------------------------------
* जो आन्दोलन के "उग्र" होने की दुहाई दे रहे हैं, उस दिल्ली में जिसमे इस आद्नोलन के चलते हुए भी रेप हो ही रहे हैं
जवाब देंहटाएं* जो इन सत्याग्रहियों को "हिंसक" लेबल कर रहे हैं
* जो एक वीर सिपाही की "बिना घावों के हुई मृत्यु" का अपमान कर रहे हैं, और उसका फ़ायदा लेकर एक सत्याग्रह को हिंसक आन्दोलन का दर्जा दे रहे हैं (हो सकता है कि बेचारा सरल ह्रदय व्यक्ति न्याय के लिए भटकती युवा पीढ़ी पर अपनी ही फ़ोर्स द्वारा किये जा रहे अन्याय और क्रूरता से इतना आहत हुआ हो कि उसे हार्ट अटेक हो गया हो ? तब तो आला अधिकारी ही उसके मुजरिम हुआ न ? - हो सकता है पोस्ट मार्टम करने वाले डॉक्टर पर भी दबाव बना कर चोटों से मृत्यु की बात लिखवा ली जाय दिल के दौरे के बजाय ?)
* जो दिल्ली पुलिस हो कर अच्छी तरह जानते हैं कि दिल्ली के ऑटो न तो सवारी की बतायी जगह जाते हैं , न ही सेफ हैं, फिर भी "लड़की बस में क्यों गयी ऑटो में क्यों नहीं" का प्रलाप करते हैं , अवह भी एक लड़के के साथ , अकेली नहीं थी वह ।
* जो यह भूल रहे हैं की आन्दोलन की शुरुआत होने से पहले ही घटना को 6 दिन गुज़र चुके थे और किसी सरकारी नेता की नींद नहीं खुली थी
* जो यह जानते हैं कि ये युवा "शनिवार सुबह" से प्रधानमन्त्री या राष्ट्रपति से मिलने को इकट्ठे हुए थे, दिसंबर की ठण्ड में शनिवार की "पूरी रात" वे "ठन्डे पानी की तेज़ धारों" से भिगोये जाने के बाद कुहरे भरी ठिठुरती सडक पर रहे थे, और यह कथित "हिंसा" रविवार शाम की घटना है
* जिन्होंने बलात्कार पर "आठ दिन" व्यक्तव्य नहीं दिए, और जब दिए तब "इन्क्व्वैरी कमिटियाँ" बिठाएँ (जब की अपराध स्वयं सिद्ध है) और वाही नेतागण एक पुलिसकर्मी की चोट पर उन्हें "2 घंटे" भी नहीं लगे कोंग्रेस विरोधियों पर दोष मढने में
* जो एस डी एम् को लड़की का बयान नहीं लेने देते और उसकी शिकायत पर उस पर ही कीचड उछ्हालते हैं
* जिनके प्रधानमन्त्री / गृह मंत्री भूल जाते हैं की उनका कर्त्तव्य लिजलिजी भावुकता का नाटकीय प्रदर्शन और घडियाली आंसू बहाना नहीं , बल्कि ठोस कदम उठान है
* जो इस दुखद स्थिति की असल जिम्मेदार "लापरवाह पुलिस" की प्रेस कोंफरेंस कर पीठ थपथपाते हैं कि ------- उन्होंने "ब्लाइंड केस" अपराधियों को "पकड़" लिया , ----------- यह भूलते हुए कि दिल्ली में पूरे रास्तो / सड़कों पर CCTV सर्विलांस है, और एक बार उन बच्चों द्वारा (साथ वाला लड़का होश में था और सब बता चूका था) बस का रंग, समय, रास्ता और उस पर लिखे शब्द बताये जाने के बाद "सिर्फ आधे घंटे" का काम है CCTV फूटेज से उसका नंबर ले कर ड्राईवर को जान पान, और उससे उसके बाकी दोस्तों का नाम पता लेना
some questions on the tragic death :
जवाब देंहटाएं1. if he had a heart problem and was not physically fit, WHY WAS he ordered to such a tough field duty?
2. the post mortem report said that heart attack COULD happen due to injuries , not that it DID SO HAPPEN _ JUST COULD HAPPEN. why such confusing terminology? legally, in the court of law, an autopsy surgeon can testify ONLY to medical findings - not to surmises about what could happen, nor about what COULD have happened at India gate where the autopsy surgeon was not present and he did not see it happening.
3. WHY was the body cremated in such a hurry ?
4. Why did they not take and keep X_ray images proving broken rib bones ?
5. How soon will they throw mud and try to intimidate the two witnesses ?
6. Was the post mortem done with only those medical men who are attached to the police dept permanently, why not post mortem specialists from other cities were called?
7. How does the death of a constable - WHATEVER BE THE REASON - make the protest "violent and unlawful"?
8. If physically unfit person is ordered to field duty which COULD cause death - is the COMMANDING OFFICER not to be co-accused ?????
unending questions - no answers from authorities
दुखद तस्वीर है देश के नेताओं की
जवाब देंहटाएंये नेतागण नेता बनने के योग्य ही नहीं हैं | एक ऐसा कानून भी बने जिसके आधार पर इस तरह की बयानबाजी करने वालों के खिलाफ केस दर्ज किया जा सके और फिर न्यायालय ये फैसला करे कि उसका बयान सही था या नहीं |
जवाब देंहटाएंमेरी नई पोस्ट:-ख्वाब क्या अपनाओगे ?
हाँ। मैंने जो सुझाव दिए हैं - उनमे एक सुझाव यह भी है । ऊपर इमेल और फेक्स नंबर हैं - भेजिएगा ज़रूर । एक तारीख को पोस्ट भी लिखिए फ़ास्ट ट्रेक कोर्ट्स की मांग को लेकर - निरर्थक नव वर्ष शुभकामना सन्देश नहीं ।
हटाएंजब तक देश की आधी आबादी (स्त्री जाती) निरंतर ऐसे भय में जी रही है - वहां शुभकामना सन्देश निरर्थक ही हैं । ज़रूर लिखिएगा एक जनवरी को ।
my suggestions
जवाब देंहटाएं1. I ask you to bring in a legislation to bring in certain provisions for setting up of "Fast track courts" which should be
1.1 Pan India
1.2 On a permanent basis, not to be setup only with public pressure in highlighted cases.
1.3 Dedicated to the cause of rapes, and not handling other case (unless they are free of rape cases.)
1.4 If they do take up other cases (when they are free of their own cause), the dates of such other should be adjusted whenever rape cases do come up.
2. Regarding police responsibilities, I ask you to kindly also make provisions to hold the police officers in-charge of the case answerable.
2.1 If it is found that the complainant / victim is being harassed by police officials,
2.2 Or that police officials have been bringing pressure on the complainant / victim and her family to reverse the case or cancel the complaint,
2.3 Or it is found that they troubled her and her family at the time of filing the FIR,
- then the concerned police officials should be prosecuted as accessories after the fact, with suitable punishments for the accessories, not just for corruption and dereliction of duties.
3. I am specifically asking for making provisions for fast investigation and verdict for the case, and NOT asking for any changes in the law of punishment.
4. Regarding bails
4.1 Primarily, accused person(s) should not get bail. But if they do, then
4.2 If the accused person(s) having taken bail ask for extension of case/ furthering of dates more than a fixed number of times (maybe three times) with excuses of sudden (non pre-existing) illnesses etc,such attempts should be considered as evidence of guilt by absconding, and
4.3 A further case of harassment to the victim which should be added to the existing charge-sheet.
5. If the victim is from economically poor family, the state should bear the cost of the expenditure towards the case.
हटाएं6. Any lawyers who try to intimidate the victim on the witness stand using sexually explicit questions should be named as accessories after the fact, and made to quit contesting on the behalf of accused persons in all later rape cases thereafter, or disbarred.
7. IF it is found that constitutional bodies like the "panchayat" etc have been involved in sexual harassment of women involving their private parts (as is happening in many places in India) by misusing their power and authority, the concerned members of the same should be immediately sacked from their positions and prosecuted at par with any other sexual offenders.
8. No constitutional body other than courts should have the right to take decisions on real or imagined cases, and punish the women accused with sexually explicit sentences. This is specifically to avoid sexual harassment of women by constitutional bodies by misusing their power and authority.
9. Regarding political responsibilities, I ask you to kindly also make provisions to hold the ruling government of the state / nation answerable.
9.1 If it is proved that at any given time, more than a fixed percentage (maybe 5%) ministers in the cabinet of any chief minister or prime minister (during one elected tenure of election to election) are found guilty of rape by the honorable court of law, then the respective chief or prime minister should be disbarred from ever contesting elections again, or holding any ministries.
9.2 Any person / persons convicted of rape should be forever banned from contesting elections, even after the completion of the sentence, whatever the length and intensity the sentence decided for the case may be.
9.3 Any duly elected representative of the citizens of India (MLA, MP, Ward member, etc, or otherwise elected person), convicted by the court of law of having brought his political influence, to drop charges of rape or delay rape case proceedings, either on the victim, or her family, or police officers investigating any rape case, should be disbarred from ever contesting elections again.
10. If a rape case is not completed within a fixed maximum period (maybe one year), legal action be taken against all concerned authorities.
11. If a woman after having filed a rape complaint reverts back and cancels it, an inquiry should be initiated automatically to fix the reason why she has done so, (who ever was behind it, the accused or the supposed victim)
12. In the long term, let ther be installed CCTV cameras in police stations to monitor how they treat the people approaching them to file FIR's
हटाएं13. Presidential pardon applications should be inapplicable or persons convicted of rapes, whether penetrative or any other category.
14. Witness protection norms should automatically be made available to the victim and her family
let the crusade continue unhindered-yeomen service for a great cause!
जवाब देंहटाएंvery bad post
जवाब देंहटाएंREALLY ????? really ? well well well - you are entitled to your opinion, I am entitled to mine. I am WARNING you and anyone here trying to intimidate me - you are against the law if you try to intimidate others from writing the truths.
हटाएंIs any of the facts reported here false ?
Is ANY of the 5 statements false? remember - all these are from video clips seen on national news channels.
Or are you implying that it is "bad" for me to object because we "women" should keep "shut-up" as sanjay nirupam told us to?
Or is it false that NO DISCIPLINARY ACTION has been initiated against any of these by the party ?
If all this is true - WHAT IS BAD ABOUT THE POST ?
I haven't abused anyone, i haven't made up stories, i haven't said falsehoods. then what is BAD about this post??? Are you saying it is BAD for me to SPEAK that they did say such insulting things about women just because they are people in power ?
REMEMBER, our CONSTITUTION allows us the liberty to speak the truth. If you try to intimidate me and prevent me from writing truths, you are also accessory to these people in trying to curtail the liberty of women, so BE CAREFUL ABOUT WHAT YOU PUT HERE IN WRITING, it is recorded for ever.
I request you to EITHER say what is bad about this post, or APOLOGIZE for calling it a bad post.
Thanks.